What To Do About Bawds and Fornicators: Sex and Law in Measure for Measure and Tudor/Stuart England

Main Article Content

Tom Flanigan

Abstract

It was fashionable throughout the Renaissance for aspiring court writers to offer respectful advice to their sovereigns or governors about how to be a good ruler—witness Machiavelli’s The Prince or English examples like Sir Thomas Elyot’s The Image of Governaunce (1541) and George Whetstone’s A Mirrour of Magistrates of Cyties (1584). Written soon after the succession of James I, Shakespeare’s Measure for Measure (1604) has been read as a kind of parable or fictionalized commentary on how a king (or duke or deputy) should or should not rule. Assuming that at some level it is this, the play would seem to contain (with its young fornicators, its tapster/bawds, its delinquent fiancés, and its lust-driven deputy) significant implied counsel on how best to legislate sexual behavior.

Article Details

Section
Articles